MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982200276 · doi:10.1021/ie020888v

Controlled Radical Grafting:  Nitroxyl-Mediated Maleation of Model Hydrocarbons

2003· article· en· W1982200276 on OpenAlexaff
Mark E. Scott, J. Scott Parent, John Dupont, Ralph A. Whitney

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisproportionationNitroxylMaleic anhydrideChemistryHomolysisHydroxylaminePolymer chemistryRadical disproportionationGraftingRadical polymerizationPolymerizationOrganic chemistryPolymerRadicalCatalysisCopolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An exploration of nitroxyl-mediated polymerization principles for the synthesis of maleated polyethylene (PE) and polybutadiene (PBD) is presented. Thermolysis and disproportionation rates for eight alkoxyamines of relevance to PE and PBD modification are reported, including heptan-3-yl- and hept-5-en-3-yl-based alkoxyamines of 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidinyloxyl, 2,2,5-trimethyl-4-phenyl-3-azahexane-3-oxyl, and 1,1,3,3-tetramethylisoindolin-2-yloxyl. The mediation of heptan-3-yl radical activity was complicated by extensive disproportionation of the alkoxyamines to olefin and the corresponding hydroxylamine. The hept-5-en-3-yl-based alkoxyamines underwent C−O bond homolysis without incurring significant disproportionation, and the addition of maleic anhydride (MAn) to the liberated allylic radical proceeded at a rate comparable to that of nitroxyl trapping. However, rapid disproportionation of the succinyl-based alkoxyamines arrested grafting after a single MAn addition. The consequences for controlled radical grafting of maleic anhydride to polymers are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and CharacterizationFrench-language works237,207