Is social participation associated with quality of life of older adults with physical disabilities?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To explore the relationships between subjective quality of life and social participation of older adults with physical disabilities. METHOD: A cross-sectional design was used with a convenience sample of 46 people aged 60 to 90 living in the community. Subjective quality of life was estimated with the Quality of Life Index and social participation with the Assessment of Life Habits. RESULTS: Only a weak relationship was found between total scores of quality of life and social participation. Interpersonal relationships, responsibilities, fitness and recreation were the categories of social participation most associated with quality of life. Social roles were more associated with quality of life than daily activities. Finally, satisfaction with the accomplishment of life habits was also more associated with quality of life than the performance itself. CONCLUSIONS: The importance of social participation in regard to the quality of life of older persons with physical disabilities living in the community is partially supported by these findings. Other studies are needed to clarify how social participation influences quality of life in this population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it