MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982214108 · doi:10.5539/ass.v9n5p191

The Role of Family in Bringing the Elderly’s Well-Being into Reality in Rural Areas of Central Java, Indonesia

2013· article· en· W1982214108 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Argyo Demartoto

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Social Science · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRecreationPerspective (graphical)SociologyWelfareSocial realityJavaWell-beingRural areaSocial WelfarePsychologySocial psychologyMedicineSocial sciencePolitical scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Indonesia, social welfare is generally defined as only well-being. In Javanese perspective, well-being is not only an economic phenomenon but also a social cultural one in which the social interaction values running determining more the attempt of achieving the well-being. Family played an important part in bringing the elderly well-being into reality according to the social-cultural values developing within the society. Several aspects were related to the role of family in bringing the elderly well-being into reality: family economic income, family dependents, interaction and communication process, elderly existence and potential. The attempts of family in bringing the elderly well-being into reality included providing physical facilities, health care, social-emotional support, and recreational activity for the elderly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Social ScienceSame topicIntergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingFrench-language works237,207