MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982226725 · doi:10.1097/iop.0b013e318275b5e2

Modified Full-Thickness Blepharotomy for Treatment of Thyroid Eye Disease

2013· article· en· W1982226725 on OpenAlex
Aree Nimitwongsakul, Christopher I. Zoumalan, Michael Kazim

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOphthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOphthalmology and Eye Disorders
Canadian institutionsColumbia College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEyelidSurgeryEye diseaseGraves' diseaseThyroidInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Upper eyelid retraction is the most common sign of thyroid eye disease (TED). The results of traditional surgical procedures to correct upper eyelid retraction have been limited by unreliable postoperative eyelid height and contour. We investigate the outcome of the surgical correction of upper eyelid retraction using a modification of the full-thickness blepharotomy technique initially described by Elner et al. METHODS: Fifty-three patients (78 eyelids) underwent a modified full-thickness blepharotomy. RESULTS: Symmetry (within 1 mm) was achieved in 40 patients (75.5%) and symmetry (within 2 mm) was achieved in 43 cases (81.1%). Of the 53 patients, 8 (15.1%) required reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: Our surgical approach can be performed efficiently and produces predictably satisfactory eyelid height even in severely retracted eyelids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.792

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it