« … alors nos garçons se marieront à vos filles, & nous ne ferons plus qu’un seul peuple1 » : religion, genre et déploiement de la souveraineté française en Amérique aux XVIe-XVIIIe siècles – une problématique2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article revisite l’histoire de la fiction du métissage, sous l’éclairage croisé de la religion, du genre et des Imperium Studies. Les premiers résultats de l’analyse montrent qu’entre les années 1500-1680, les Autres pouvaient facilement s’assimiler à la société des Français par les voies privilégiées et éminemment genrées qu’étaient le baptême et le mariage. Or mettre en regard ces voies d’assimilation avec l’échec que fut la chimère (tout aussi genrée) de faire un seul peuple franco-amérindien, permet de faire ressortir des mécanismes mentalitaires qui jouèrent en faveur de la tentation impérialiste – celle du roi de France, en veine d’absolutisme, comme celle de l’Église de Rome, catholique et donc universelle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".