Measurements of Ascorbic Acid and Glutathione in Exfoliated Cervicovaginal Epithelial Cells of Smokers and Women with Cervical Dysplasias
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This report emphasizes the ability to quantify ascorbic acid (AA) and reduced glutathione (GSH) levels in exfoliated cervicovaginal epithelial cells obtained by a lavage technique. Sixty-two women with abnormal Papanicolaou smears underwent colposcopic examinations. Colposcopic lesions were biopsied and histopathologically graded. Marked variations in the number of cells and in the levels of AA and GSH were observed. In cigarette smokers, the number of exfoliated cells retrieved was significantly higher (p less than 0.05, by Student's t test). The simultaneous investigation of biochemical and virologic parameters in exfoliated cervicovaginal epithelial cells, in conjunction with the known cytopathologic and epidemiologic risk variables, provides a novel approach to elucidate factor(s) that may inhibit or promote cervical carcinogenesis in designed prospective studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".