MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Autolytic Debridement of a Large, Necrotic, Fully Occluded Foot Ulcer Using a Hydrocolloid Dressing in a Diabetic Patient

2013· review· en· W1982279418 on OpenAlexaff
Lisa Cuschieri, Joanna Debosz, Patricia Miiller, Maria Celis

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Skin & Wound Care · 2013
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicWound Healing and Treatments
Canadian institutionsCalgary Laboratory Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDebridement (dental)SurgeryWound careGranulation tissueNecrotic tissueDiabetic footWound healingTissue necrosisAmputationFoot (prosody)AnkleDiabetes mellitus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article was to review the authors' experience with hydrocolloid dressings in foot ulcers, especially in diabetic patients. Engineered as part of stomal flange, hydrocolloid dressings established their presence in wound care management after successfully protecting peristomal skin. They are occlusive dressings and have been valued for their ability to support autolytic debridement, thus removing necrotic tissue--a barrier to healing--from the wound bed. These dressings have received negative attention, however, after a number of case reports indicated the products as a possible cause of wound deterioration, amputation, and death, when used on foot ulcers. Therefore, in general, their use has been discouraged in the treatment of foot ulcers. The authors present a case in which a hydrocolloid dressing was used to successfully debride a large, necrotic, fully occluded foot ulcer in a diabetic patient. DESIGN: A case report. SUBJECT: A 60-year-old man with diabetes, post-renal transplant, with a large necrotic lesion on the lateral ankle, likely secondary to a burn. RESULT: There was complete resolution of the wound in 25 weeks. Consistent use of hydrocolloids over 10 weeks healed a fully necrotic wound bed to complete granulation and the initiation of epithelialization. Infection was not a complication in this case. The wound has remained closed after 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Removal of necrotic tissue from the wound bed was evident after using hydrocolloid dressing, thus expediting healing of the wound. It was accomplished with frequent monitoring and respecting contraindications to the use of this product. This treatment was invaluable in effectively liquefying necrotic material in the wound bed in a noninvasive manner. The authors recommend consideration of using this type of dressing for similar lesions to more effectively and hastily remove barriers to healing, provided that the wounds are not infected and patients do not have peripheral arterial disease and are not severely medically compromised. Frequent monitoring and dressing change are also mandatory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Skin & Wound CareSame topicWound Healing and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207