« Partis politiques », cites, etats federaux: Le temoignage de l’historien d’Oxyrhynchos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La question de l’existence de véritables « partis politiques » dans la Grèce ancienne a été l’objet d’un grand débat dans la critique moderne. L’auteur des Helléniques d’Oxyrhynchos (P) nous donne à ce propos un témoignage particulièrement intéressant qu’on peut rattacher à son intérêt marqué pour la terminologie relative aux « partis » et pour la politique intérieure des cités grecques. Les rensei-gnements que P nous fournit sur la situation politique de la Béotie sont particu-lièrement intéressants et nous permettent de mieux comprendre la nature des oppositions entre les partis dans les états fédéraux. La dénomination de « parti » convient bien aux factions car leurs programmes politiques étaient aisément identifiables et leurs chefs étaient assez puissants pour leur assurer une certaine continuité. En outre, ces factions bénéficiaient d’un appui populaire soutenu et se distinguaient par des positions nettement rangées sur les questions de politique internationale. The existence of political “parties” in ancient Greece has been widely discussed by scholars. Since he employs highly refined terminology and provides much information on the internal politics of Greek cities, the author of the Hellenica Oxyrhynchia offers a particularly interesting insight into this problem. Information is particularly ample on Boeotia, and thus within the peculiar context of a federal state distinct factions can be identified : they are characterized by continuity in political programs and leadership and by a certain numerical consistency, as well as by different constitutional ideologies and federal policies, and by different positions in international matters. Because of these features, these factions can be con-sidered “parties” despite the scepticism of many scholars.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".