MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982299215 · doi:10.7202/018453ar

Conflits d’appropriation d’espaces urbains centraux

2008· article· fr· W1982299215 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Richard L. Morin, Michel Parazelli, Kenza Benali

Bibliographic record

VenueNouvelles pratiques sociales · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsMinistère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)Université du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAppropriationPolitical scienceHumanitiesSociologyArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les populations marginalisées sont particulièrement présentes dans certains quartiers centraux. Or, ces quartiers qui montrent habituellement des signes de déclin font aussi généralement l’objet d’opérations de revitalisation qui visent à y attirer de nouveaux résidants et à y promouvoir de nouvelles activités économiques. Les populations marginalisées représentent alors des « nuisances » à la fois pour les autorités publiques, les investisseurs privés et les résidants. Les espaces qu’elles investissent font ainsi l’objet de conflits d’appropriation. Ces conflits sont analysés à partir d’une recherche menée dans deux quartiers centraux, à savoir Centre-Sud à Montréal et Saint-Roch à Québec.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.857
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2008
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNouvelles pratiques socialesSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207