Preparation and pH Triggered Inversion of Vesicles from Poly(acrylic Acid)-<i>b</i><i>lock</i>-Polystyrene-<i>b</i><i>lock</i>-Poly(4-vinyl Pyridine)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aggregate morphologies of the biamphiphilic triblock PAA(26)-b-PS(890)-b-P4VP(40) have been studied by TEM as a function of pH in DMF/THF/H(2)O mixtures. The outside surfaces of the aggregates were characterized by zeta potential measurements. Starting at the apparent pH (pH) of 1, and increasing gradually to pH14, the aggregate morphologies of this triblock change progressively from vesicles (pH1), to solid spherical or ellipsoidal aggregates (pH3 approximately 11), and finally back to vesicles (pH14). Vesicles prepared at pH1 contain P4VP chains on the outside and PAA chains on the inside, while those prepared from the same triblock at pH14 contain PAA outside and P4VP inside. The segregation is based on the difference in repulsive interactions within the PAA or P4VP corona under different pH conditions. At low pH, the curvature is stabilized through increased repulsive interactions between the P4VP chains on the outside relative to the less repulsive interactions between the PAA chains on the inside. At pH14, by contrast, the PAA is preferentially segregated to the outside and the P4VP to the inside because of the increased repulsive interaction between PAA chains and the decreased repulsive interaction between P4VP chains at high pH. Most importantly, vesicles with PAA on the outside can be inverted to P4VP on the outside by changing the pH while the vesicles have swollen cores and are under dynamic conditions. The conversion mechanism is suggested to involve a whole vesicle process because the CMC is far too low for single chain reassembly to be involved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".