Formation of a Quaternary Complex of HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase with a Nucleotide-competing Inhibitor and Its ATP Enhancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nucleotide-competing reverse transcriptase inhibitors were shown to bind reversibly to the nucleotide-binding site of the reverse transcriptase (RT) enzyme of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). Here, we show that the presence of ATP can enhance the inhibitory effects of the prototype compound INDOPY-1. We employed a combination of cell-free and cell-based assays to shed light on the underlying molecular mechanism. Binding studies and site-specific footprinting experiments demonstrate the existence of a stable quaternary complex with HIV-1 RT, its nucleic acid substrate, INDOPY-1, and ATP. The complex is frozen in the post-translocational state that usually accommodates the incoming nucleotide substrate. Structure-activity relationship studies show that both the base and the phosphate moieties of ATP are elements that play important roles in enhancing the inhibitory effects of INDOPY-1. In vitro susceptibility measurements with mutant viruses containing amino acid substitutions K70G, V75T, L228R, and K219R in the putative ATP binding pocket revealed unexpectedly a hypersusceptible phenotype with respect to INDOPY-1. The same mutational cluster was previously shown to reduce susceptibility to the pyrophosphate analog phosphonoformic acid. However, in the absence of INDOPY-1, ATP can bind and act as a pyrophosphate donor under conditions that favor formation of the pre-translocated RT complex. We therefore conclude that the mutant enzyme facilitates simultaneous binding of INDOPY-1 and ATP to the post-translocated complex. Based on these data, we propose a model in which the bound ATP traps the inhibitor, which, in turn, compromises its dissociation. Background: Nucleotide-competing RT inhibitors (NcRTIs), like INDOPY-1, show antiviral activity against HIV. Results: HIV-1 RT, the nucleic acid substrate, INDOPY-1, and its enhancer ATP can form a quaternary complex in the post-translocational state. Conclusion: The bound ATP compromises dissociation of the inhibitor from the RT complex. Significance: These findings reveal a novel mechanism of inhibition of HIV-1 RT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".