Simultaneous determination of lodine value and <i>trans</i> content of fats and oils by single‐bounce horizontal attenuated total reflectance fourier transform infrared spectroscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A method for the simultaneous determination of iodine value (IV) and trans content from the Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of neat fats and oils recorded with the use of a heated single‐bounce horizontal attenuated total reflectance (SB‐HATR) sampling accessory was developed. Partial least squares (PLS) regression was employed for the development of the calibration models, and a set of nine pure triacylglycerols served as the calibration standards. Regression of the FTIR/PLS‐predicted IV and trans contents for ten partially hydrogenated oil samples against reference values obtained by gas chromatography yielded slopes close to unity and SD of <1. Good agreement (SD<0.35) also was obtained between the trans predictions from the PLS calibration model and trans determinations performed by the recently adopted AOCS FTIR/SBHART method for the determination of isolated trans isomers in fats and oils.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".