MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982356783 · doi:10.7202/027447ar

Les passions de l’âme de Descartes : les limites d'un type d’explication

2007· article· fr· W1982356783 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Paule-Monique Vernes

Bibliographic record

VenuePhilosophiques · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPassionsHumanitiesPhilosophyPassionExplicationPsychologyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article analyse les Passions de l'âme pour mettre en relief les stratégies cartésiennes : Descartes montre les limites de l'explication mécaniste des passions par leurs causes prochaines et dernières, les esprits animaux. Cette explication se doublant d'une théorie de l'objet affectif, de l'importance des objets passionnants qui sont les causes premières et principales des passions, se termine par l'exaltation de la générosité, vertu et passion de la liberté. Ce n'est que parce que le vocabulaire de l'intentionnalité et de la morale se réfléchit sur le vocabulaire mécaniste abstrait qu 'il lui donne un sens. Aussi l'ouvrage devrait-il être parcouru à l'envers, en commençant par la fin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.769
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.201
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.123 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhilosophiquesSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207