MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982372429 · doi:10.1109/cjece.2007.4413128

Test bus assignment, sizing, and partitioning for system-on-chip

2007· article· en· W1982372429 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Haidar Harmanani, Rachel Sawan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSizingChipEmbedded systemComputer scienceSystem on a chipDesign for testingTest (biology)EngineeringReliability engineeringTestability

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The test access mechanism (TAM) is an important element of test architectures for embedded cores and is responsible for on-chip test pattern transport from the source to the core under test to the sink. Efficient TAM design is of critical importance in system-on-chip integration since it directly impacts testing time and hardware cost. In this paper, an efficient genetic algorithm for designing test access architectures while investigating test bus sizing and concurrently assigning cores to test buses is proposed. Experimental results are presented to demonstrate that the proposed TAM optimization methodology provides efficient test bus designs with minimum testing time while outperforming reported techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.375

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Electrical and Computer EngineeringSame topicVLSI and Analog Circuit TestingFrench-language works237,207