MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982431965 · doi:10.2118/165388-ms

Control of Reservoir Heterogeneity in SAGD Bitumen Processes

2013· article· en· W1982431965 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Heavy Oil Conference-Canada · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSteam injectionSteam-assisted gravity drainagePetroleum engineeringController (irrigation)Water injection (oil production)PID controllerAsphaltProcess controlProcess (computing)WellboreEnvironmental scienceEngineeringTemperature controlComputer scienceMechanical engineeringOil sandsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Uniform steam chamber growth (conformance) in a Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) process promotes enhanced bitumen recovery, project economics and environmental benefits. In the past, operators have implemented numerous alternative strategies to improve steam conformance in the SAGD process. Simultaneous injection in the inner tubing and annular space or use of dual-tubing completions are commonly used to provide some degree of injection control at the heel- and toe-regions of the horizontal well pair. However, this does not necessarily guarantee the uniformity and performance efficiencies sought. Distributed flow control devices (FCDs) can also contribute to more uniform production and injection. They can be incorporated in the horizontal production completion as restrictive elements to modify the pressure distribution along the length of the wellbore. A hybrid of these two technologies is proposed to provide superior (uniform and efficient) steam chamber development that benefits asset performance in highly heterogeneous bitumen reservoirs. It has been shown that using Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) feedback to control the steam injection can be beneficial. The feedback control is applied to each steam injection point in the horizontal well pair. Injection at these control points is regulated by a PID feedback controller which monitors temperature differences between injected and produced fluids in order to both enforce a specified subcool and to achieve uniform production along the entire length of the producer. This paper examines detailed wellbore simulations of a SAGD well pair with an FCD completion in the producer and PID controlled steam injection with dual tubing strings. A synthetic reservoir model, based on logs from the Athabasca region of Alberta, is employed and represents a highly heterogeneous formation with properties typical of a bitumen resource. Feedback controlled steam injection (FCSI) can be dynamically configured to target the worst-offending regions of the well pair in order to (i) start the PID control as early as possible after switchover, (ii) achieve a specified subcool target in those regions that would benefit most from the subcool and (iii) temporarily ignore regions which are bypassed and difficult to produce, but which may be dynamically included at a later time. Practical algorithms are presented to achieve these goals, based on existing technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.783

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it