The Hyperthermic Effect of a Distal Volar Forearm Nerve Block: A Possible Treatment of Acute Digital Frostbite Injuries?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The authors have observed that carpal tunnel surgery nerve blocks consisting of subfascial distal volar forearm injection of 10 cc of 1% lidocaine with epinephrine result in fingers that appear hyperemic, warm, and numb in both median and ulnar nerve distributions. The purposes of this study were to (1) determine whether forearm nerve blocks in patients undergoing carpal tunnel releases result in an objective increase in finger temperature, and (2) document the location and duration of finger anesthesia. METHODS: Thirty-nine patients undergoing unilateral carpal tunnel release were studied prospectively. An infrared thermometer was used to measure the temperature in the fingers of operative and nonoperative hands before and after injection of local anesthetic. The distal volar forearm block was performed using 10 cc of 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine deep to the forearm fascia between the median and ulnar nerves 1 cm proximal to the wrist crease. Before and after carpal tunnel release, bilateral finger temperatures were measured at hourly intervals. Statistical analysis included a one-sample test of proportions. RESULTS: The finger temperature of the operative hand was significantly warmer than the unoperated hand over the first 2 hours after the nerve block. Seventy-four percent of patients had a statistically significant increase in temperature. On average, the nerve block lasted 6.27 hours in the median nerve distribution and 5.78 hours in the ulnar nerve distribution. CONCLUSIONS: Forearm nerve blocks produce a chemical sympathectomy that provides a significant increase in skin temperature as a result of vasodilatation in most patients. They also provide prolonged finger numbness. This could be of clinical benefit in patients with acute finger frostbite injuries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".