Dok-R Binds c-Abl and Regulates Abl Kinase Activity and Mediates Cytoskeletal Reorganization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dok-R, also known as Dok-2/FRIP, belongs to the DOK family of signaling molecules that become tyrosine-phosphorylated by several different receptor and cytoplasmic tyrosine kinases. Tyrosine phosphorylation of DOK proteins establishes high affinity binding sites for other signaling molecules leading to activation of a signaling cascade. Here we show that Dok-R associates with c-Abl directly via a constitutive SH3-mediated interaction and that this binding requires a PMMP motif in the proline-rich tail of Dok-R. The Dok-R-Abl interaction is further enhanced by an active c-Abl kinase, which requires the presence of its SH2 domain. Interaction of Dok-R with c-Abl also results in an increase in c-Abl tyrosine phosphorylation and kinase activity. Furthermore, we demonstrate that this increase in kinase activity correlates with a concomitant increase in c-Abl-mediated biological activity as measured by the formation of actin microspikes. Our data are the first to demonstrate that Dok-R and c-Abl interact in both a constitutive and inducible fashion and that Dok-R influences the intracellular kinase and biological activity of c-Abl.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".