MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982455037 · doi:10.1002/2014gc005296

The intensity of the geomagnetic field from 2.4 Ga old Indian dykes

2014· article· en· W1982455037 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jean‐Pierre Valet, Jean Besse, Anil Kumar, Sayoob Vadakke‐Chanat, Édouard Philippe

Bibliographic record

VenueGeochemistry Geophysics Geosystems · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyPaleomagnetismEarth's magnetic fieldPrecambrianDynamo theoryDynamoGeophysicsArcheanSecular variationMantle (geology)PaleontologySeismologyMagnetic field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Precambrian paleomagnetic records from dyke swarms provide a unique source of information regarding the Archean geomagnetic field and more specifically the average field strength produced by the early dynamo. We sampled 16 paleomagnetic sites from the Dharwar giant dyke swarm in southern India which was emplaced between 2.365 and 2.368 Ga. Despite taking great care in selecting locations exempt of any geological disturbance, only two of these sites provided primary directions with very steep inclinations and therefore were emplaced in close to a magnetic pole. Paleointensity experiments were conducted on a subset of samples from the dyke margins. The characteristic magnetization is carried by single domain magnetite grains with a very narrow range of unblocking temperatures inferred from the sharp decrease by at least 75% of their remanence above 520°C. The paleointensity results indicate an average low field of 9.2 ± 7 µT, consistent with reported values from Canadian dyke swarms for the same period. These results combined with the Thellier‐Thellier determinations obtained so far for the Precambrian suggest that a low field period prevailed from circa 2.3 to 1.8 Ga, while the preceding and following time intervals are characterized by significantly stronger paleointensities. Although this suite of episodes is not fully incompatible with previous models for the long‐term evolution of the geodynamo, it is tempting to make the link with the recent suggestion of an early dynamo sustained within a conductive magma layer at the base of the mantle from 3.5 to 2.5 Ga which progressively declined until convection became sufficiently efficient to reactivate a strong dynamo process within the Earth's liquid core.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.892

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeochemistry Geophysics GeosystemsSame topicGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism StudiesFrench-language works237,207