MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Testing of Steel Pipes Under Bending, Twist, and Shear

2003· article· en· W1982464124 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Structural Engineering · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTorsion (gastropod)Structural engineeringShear (geology)TwistMaterials scienceBendingBending momentShear forceMechanicsEngineeringComposite materialPhysicsMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plastic interaction relationships for pipes subjected to biaxial bending, biaxial shear, torsion, axial force, and internal/external pressure were recently developed. This paper reports a full-scale experimental program that consists of six tests aimed at verifying the validity of the interaction relationships under loads that induce shear force, bending, and twisting moments. The pipe configurations in the postbuckling range of deformation are observed and documented. The peak loads obtained in the experiments agree very well with analytical predictions. Based on the experimental results obtained in this study and on other complementary experiments previously conducted, it is proposed that the interaction relationships be adopted in the design of elevated stocky steel pipes. An example is provided in order to illustrate the applicability of interaction relationships in a practical design problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.335
Threshold uncertainty score0.777

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it