MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982471605 · doi:10.1063/1.4906182

166Er Mössbauer spectroscopy study of magnetic ordering in a spinel-based potential spin-ice system: CdEr2S4

2015· article· en· W1982471605 on OpenAlexafffund
Anaëlle Legros, D. H. Ryan, P. Dalmas de Réotier, A. Yaouanc, C. Marı́n

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcMaster University
KeywordsHyperfine structureMössbauer spectroscopyParamagnetismSpinelCondensed matter physicsRelaxation (psychology)SpectroscopyMagnetic relaxationMaterials scienceNuclear magnetic resonanceChemistryMagnetic fieldMagnetizationCrystallographyPhysicsAtomic physicsMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

166Er Mössbauer spectroscopy measurements of CdEr2S4 show a large hyperfine field (Bhf) of 727.6(8) T at 5 K and clear evidence for slow paramagnetic relaxation with an energy barrier to reversal of 114(3) K. This behaviour stands in strong contrast to that of the corresponding pyrochlores (Er2Sn2O7 and Er2Ti2O7) where no magnetic effects are seen down to 1.56 K. The clearly dynamic 166Er Mössbauer spectra and the absence of a break in the susceptibility data suggest that there is no magnetic order above 1.8 K in CdEr2S4.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.709
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Condensed Matter PhysicsFrench-language works237,207