MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982490605 · doi:10.1139/t02-014

Mechanical behavior of Tien-Liao mudstone in hollow cylinder tests

2002· article· en· W1982490605 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Der-Her Lee, C. Hsein Juang, Hung‐Ming Lin, Shing-Hung Yeh

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRock Mechanics and Modeling
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStress pathYield (engineering)Geotechnical engineeringYield surfaceCylinderPrincipal stressSeries (stratigraphy)Structural engineeringStress (linguistics)GeologySurface (topology)EngineeringMathematicsMaterials sciencePlasticityGeometryFinite element methodConstitutive equationComposite materialMechanical engineeringPetrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A series of hollow cylinder tests were conducted to study the stress–strain characteristics and the yield surface of Tein-Liao mudstone, a soft rock widely distributed in southwestern Taiwan. These tests were carried out under different stress paths designed to utilize the versatility of the hollow cylinder testing system. The test results were used to establish the yield surface of the mudstone in the principal stress space. The experimental results were used to examine the accuracy of existing yield criteria, such as the Coulomb criterion, the extended Hoek-Brown model, and the Kim-Lade model. Among the three yield criteria examined, the Kim-Lade model provided the best agreement with the experimental results, although both the extended Hoek-Brown model and the Kim-Lade model are adequate for modeling the yield surface of the mudstone.Key words: rock, yield surface, stress path, hollow cylinder test.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.241
Threshold uncertainty score0.680

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicRock Mechanics and ModelingFrench-language works237,207