Delamination Cysts: A Predictor of Acetabular Cartilage Delamination in Hips with a Labral Tear
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UNLABELLED: The treatment and prognosis of labral tears of the hip depend primarily on whether there is concomitant injury of the adjacent acetabular articular cartilage. We asked whether a delamination cyst on the preoperative plain radiographs correlated with delamination of the acetabular articular cartilage at the time of hip arthroscopy. We reviewed the preoperative radiographs of 125 consecutive hips that had a labral tear at hip arthroscopy for the presence of a delamination cyst. A delamination cyst was defined as an acetabular subchondral cyst either directly adjacent to a lateral acetabular cyst or in relation to a subchondral crack in the anterosuperior portion of the acetabulum. All patients with acetabular cartilage delamination at arthroscopy were identified. There were 16 patients with delamination cysts on radiographs and 15 patients with cartilage delamination at arthroscopy. A delamination cyst on the preoperative anteroposterior and/or frog lateral radiographs of the hip accurately predicted acetabular cartilage delamination, especially in hips with labral tears not caused by a major trauma. A delamination cyst is a previously unrecognized and novel radiographic sign that can preoperatively identify acetabular cartilage delamination in patients with labral tears, thereby facilitating the selection of the appropriate surgery and determining prognosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, diagnostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".