MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982494566 · doi:10.1109/jqe.2010.2055042

Characteristics of Edge-Emitting Bragg Reflection Waveguide Lasers

2010· article· en· W1982494566 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLasing thresholdLaserOpticsMaterials scienceWaveguideOptoelectronicsReflection (computer programming)Semiconductor laser theoryBragg's lawTotal internal reflectionContinuous waveQuantum dot laserPhysicsDiffraction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We demonstrate experimentally the stable continuous-wave (CW) single-mode operation of Bragg reflection waveguide (BRW) lasers from 10 to 100°C. The threshold characteristics, quantum efficiency, gain, and self-heating characteristics are investigated in detail. Threefold enhancement in the optical confinement is achieved using these BRW structures for a core width two times that of their edge-emitting total internal reflection counterparts. The device shows also the high gain and characteristic temperature (~197 K) under CW operation from 10 to 100°C. The mode stability is analyzed by the calculated mode reflection spectrum, injection-current-dependent lasing spectrum, and near-field patterns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.295
Threshold uncertainty score0.531

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it