MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982518375 · doi:10.1002/pip.586

Fundamental boron–oxygen‐related carrier lifetime limit in mono‐ and multicrystalline silicon

2005· article· en· W1982518375 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Karsten Bothe, R.A. Sinton, Jan Schmidt

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress in Photovoltaics Research and Applications · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon and Solar Cell Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of Gender and HealthBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
KeywordsSiliconBoronCarrier lifetimeMaterials scienceSubstrate (aquarium)ImpurityMetastabilityOxygenDopingOptoelectronicsChemical physicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Boron‐doped crystalline silicon is the most relevant material in today's solar cell production. Following the trend towards higher efficiencies, silicon substrate materials with high carrier lifetimes are becoming more and more important. In silicon with sufficiently low metal impurity concentrations, the carrier lifetime is ultimately limited by a metastable boron–oxygen‐related defect, which forms under minority‐carrier injection. We have analysed 49 different Czochralski‐grown silicon materials of numerous suppliers with various boron and oxygen concentrations. On the basis of our measured lifetime data, we have derived a universal empirical parameterisation predicting the stable carrier lifetime from the boron and oxygen content in the crystalline silicon material. For multicrystalline silicon it is shown that the predicted carrier lifetime can be regarded as a fundamental upper limit. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations284
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProgress in Photovoltaics Research and ApplicationsSame topicSilicon and Solar Cell TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207