MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982524190 · doi:10.1109/naps.2011.6024859

Comparative studies of the stabilities to oxidation and electrical discharge between ester fluids and transformer oils

2011· article· en· W1982524190 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlammable liquidMineral oilTransformer oilTransformerMaterials sciencePetroleum engineeringEnvironmental scienceForensic engineeringPulp and paper industryProcess engineeringWaste managementEngineeringMetallurgyVoltageElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The growing demands for improved fire safety, source material sustainability, environment friendliness, and asset life extension have driven the research and development efforts of natural/synthetic esters, less-flammable fluids. This contribution reports some investigations on commercially available ester fluids. Many comparisons are made to the quality test results of mineral oil, as this is something we are all familiar with. The stability under electrical stress and the stability to aging of the insulating fluids were investigated. The gassing performance characteristics of natural ester fluids are far superior to those of conventional mineral oil. A significant reduction in insulation aging rate was observed with synthetic ester fluids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.225
Threshold uncertainty score0.191

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it