MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982527606 · doi:10.5376/mmr.2013.03.0002

Carcinogenic Assay of Foods Using Auxotrophic Strains of <i>Salmonella typhimurium</i> Employing Reverse Mutation Technique

2013· article· en· W1982527606 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Appisetty Ramya Lakshmi, S. Ramesh, K. Chairman, M. Jeyamala, Srivarshini Sankar, A. Murugan

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Microbiology Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCarcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSalmonellaChemistryCarcinogenAuxotrophyMutationMicrobiologyBiologyFood scienceGeneticsEscherichia coliBacteriaGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

World hastens the changes in food items, that facilities of the addition of colouring agents and flavouring agents. They were not aware of the treat of dangers awaiting them in the form of food increasing with modernization in food along with the development new diseases many desirable factors are involved in foods. Fifty five food samples were tested by the reverse Mutation test for the presence of carcinogenic chemicals. The auxotrophic mutant strain had the character of his arg+ , amp+ and Tet +. From the result of reverse mutation assay, we informed that 48% of sample was under 2+ level, 40% of sample under 1+ level were recorded for carcinogenic behavior while 59.2% the sample did not reflect any level. Out of 55 samples, 41.8% showed the positive result that indicated dangerous carcinogenic chemicals in fried oil, reheated oil, halwa, jangiri etc., Even sweets had the high content of carcinogens which were mostly preferred by kids. The extra chromosomal DNAs isolated were electrophoresed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Microbiology ResearchSame topicCarcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentFrench-language works237,207