MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982535162 · doi:10.1109/iemc.2002.1038470

An online integrated operational decision support system with predefined knowledge base for semiconductor industry

2003· article· en· W1982535162 on OpenAlexaff
V. Divate, P. Saengpongpaew

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicScheduling and Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsAdvanced Micro Devices (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceVariety (cybernetics)Knowledge baseDecision support systemProduction (economics)Event (particle physics)Reliability engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have developed an online predefined knowledge-based decision support system for AMID (Thailand) Ltd. It is a single interactive, computer based decision-making system for a large variety of operations, tasks, and conditions, which don't require special programming skills for maintenance. AMD is dealing in the manufacture of flash memory with a variety of devices. Each device has several common or device specific rules. Each production lot has to pass through a series of different engineering rules to get released. Each rule is defined by an experienced engineer and shared in a centralized common database. Each device has got a different program as per the type of package and the type of booting. If we combine all variables the scenario will become very complicated. For e.g. Millions of flash memory/week, thousands of lots/week, hundreds of test program, devices, packages and a series of common and device specific rules of each device to be applied on each lot. The system has to make several calculations on production data to validate each rule applied on that device. Secondly, the fault diagnosis and the decisions should come online immediately after such an event. The system has proved to be an error free system and the best decision making tool on production environment; so this paper describes a deep-knowledge base management and use of online decision support system shell for diagnosing faults in manufacturing operations of the semiconductor Industry with real world application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicScheduling and Optimization AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207