Stress along tensile lap-spliced fibre reinforced polymer reinforcing bars in concrete
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A theoretical study was carried out to investigate stress along tensile lap-spliced spaced or bundled fibre reinforced polymer (FRP) bars in concrete. R. Tepfers developed a mathematical model, which could be applied for any type of reinforcing bar, based on the modulus of displacement theory. The mathematical model can predict the bond stress and stresses in the reinforcing bars and the surrounding concrete. In this paper, the model developed by Tepfers was represented by applying the modulus of displacement theory, and theoretical predictions are compared with the experimental results from testing 16 large-scale concrete beams. Good agreement between the theoretical values and experimental results was observed at three stages of loading. Recommendations for investigating the modulus of displacement from pullout tests have been included. Lastly, the maximum average bond stress of spliced FRP bars can be estimated using the ultimate failure pattern analysis, in which the contributions of the splitting resistance were included.Key words: beams, fibre reinforced polymer (FRP) bars, bundled bars, concrete, tensile lap-splice, pullout tests, modulus of displacement, flexural tests.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".