MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1982560564 · doi:10.1086/380432

The Galactic Inner Halo: Searching for White Dwarfs and Measuring the Fundamental Galactic Constant, Θ<sub>0</sub>/<i>R</i><sub>0</sub>

2004· article· en· W1982560564 on OpenAlexaff
Jasonjot Singh Kalirai, Harvey B. Richer, Brad M. S. Hansen, P. B. Stetson, Michael M. Shara, I. Saviane, R. Michael Rich, Marco Limongi, Rodrigo Ibata, B. K. Gibson, Gregory G. Fahlman, James Brewer

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsHerzberg Institute of AstrophysicsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGalactic haloHaloAstrophysicsWhite dwarfConstant (computer programming)PhysicsGalactic coronaAstronomyGalactic tideWhite (mutation)Milky WayGalaxyStarsComputer scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We establish an extragalactic, zero-motion frame of reference within the deepest optical image of a globular star cluster, a Hubble Space Telescope ( HST ) 123 orbit exposure of M4 (GO 8679, Cycle 9). The line of sight beyond M4 ( l , b = 351 ° ,16 ° ) intersects the inner halo (spheroid) of our Galaxy at a tangent-point distance of 7.6 kpc (for R 0 = 8 kpc). The main sequence of this population can be clearly seen on the color-magnitude diagram (CMD) below the M4 main sequence. We isolate these spheroid stars from the cluster on the basis of their proper motions over the 6 yr baseline between these observations and others made at a previous epoch with HST (GO 5461, Cycle 4). Distant background galaxies are also found on the same sight line by using image-morphology techniques. This fixed-reference frame allows us to determine an independent measurement of the fundamental Galactic constant, Ω 0 = Θ 0 / R 0 = 25.3 ± 2.6 km s -1 kpc -1 , thus providing a velocity of the local standard of rest v LSR = Θ 0 = 202.7 ± 24.7 km s -1 for R 0 = 8.0 ± 0.5 kpc. Second, the galaxies allow a direct measurement of M4's absolute proper motion, μ α = -12.26 ± 0.54 mas yr -1 , μ δ = -18.95 ± 0.54 mas yr -1 , in excellent agreement with recent studies. The clear separation of galaxies from stars in these deep data also allow us to search for inner halo white dwarfs. We model the conventional Galactic contributions of white dwarfs along our line of sight and predict 7.9 thin-disk, 6.3 thick-disk, and 2.2 spheroid objects to the limiting magnitude at which we can clearly delineate stars from galaxies ( V ~ 29). An additional 2.5 objects are expected from a 20% white dwarf dark halo consisting of 0.5 M ☉ objects, 70% of which are of the DA type. After considering the kinematics and morphology of the objects in our data set, we find the number of white dwarfs to be consistent with the predictions for each of the conventional populations. However, we do not find any evidence for dark halo white dwarfs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→