MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982562517 · doi:10.1080/2201473x.2014.982495

‘Blond Beasts of Prey’: A Nietzschean interpretation of the language of Britain's colonisation of New Zealand

2014· article· en· W1982562517 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul Moon

Bibliographic record

VenueSettler Colonial Studies · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicNietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoralityColonisationColonialismSociologyNexus (standard)EpistemologyInterpretation (philosophy)MetisHistoryPhilosophyArchaeologyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article explores the efficacy of applying Friedrich Nietzsche's hypothetical reconstruction of the emergence of human morality, to examples of the language used by agents of the British colonisation of New Zealand in the nineteenth century, with a particular focus on notions of cultural and racial superiority/inferiority. The particular nexus of psychology and philosophy that Nietzsche formulated provides a useful ontological framework for examining the phenomenon of colonisation, especially its often explicitly racial orientation. Nietzsche's architecture of the history of morality, with its constituent elements of race, mastery, civilisation, savagery, morality, imperial expansion, and pan-Europeanism, is evident in much of the language used by various agents of Britain's colonisation of New Zealand in the nineteenth century. The analogies are not always exact, and the connections are correlative rather than causative (necessarily so, on the basis that Neitzsche's reconstruction of the emergence of human morality is retrospectively applied in this article), but the particular nexus of psychology and philosophy that Nietzsche formulated does provide a useful ontological framework for examining the phenomenon of colonisation, especially its often explicitly racial orientation. Nietzsche's theories in this area also resonate with the notion of settler colonialism, in which an expanding dominant population spreads out into new territories, and then encodes and reproduces the unequal relationships that it has used to coerce other populations during previous phases of its expansion. The conclusion reached is that Nietzsche's architecture of the history of morality, despite being largely conjectural, can serve as a theoretical model that assists in interpreting and contextualising some of the language that accompanied Britain's colonisation of New Zealand in ways not afforded by other theoretical approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.137
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.022
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSettler Colonial StudiesSame topicNietzsche, Schopenhauer, and HegelFrench-language works237,207