MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982573060 · doi:10.1080/14681990600861040

Marital relationship and psychological distress: Its correlates and treatments

2006· article· en· W1982573060 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSexual & Relationship Therapy · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAttachment and Relationship Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeUniversité de MontréalHôpital Louis-H LafontaineUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyAssociation (psychology)AnxietyPsychological distressDepressive symptomsClinical psychologyDistressMarital relationshipPsychotherapistPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The present review examines the link of marital relationship with depressive and anxiety disorders in adult and older couples. Empirical and descriptive studies from the period 1984 to 2005 are reviewed. Particular emphasis is placed on the role of different treatment modalities and methodological approaches for dealing with co-occurring marital discord and psychological distress. Overall, the literature indicates a strong association of depressive symptoms with marital relationship, being this association of a different nature in adult and older couples. Possible causal pathways of this relationship are discussed. However, the literature about the link between anxiety disorders and marital discord is inconclusive, and its relationship in older couples has not yet been addressed. Suggestions for future research are included.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.111
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it