MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982628334 · doi:10.1081/wct-200046256

Bleachability of Kraft Pulps from Earlywood and Latewood of Fast‐Growing Loblolly Pine

2004· article· en· W1982628334 on OpenAlexaff
Qizhou Dai, Hasan Jameel, Hou‐min Chang, John F. Kadla

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Wood Chemistry and Technology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLignin and Wood Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLoblolly pineKraft processKappa numberKraft paperChemistryPulp (tooth)Pulp and paper industrySoftwoodBotanyPinus <genus>Biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The pulping and bleaching properties of earlywood and latewood of a fast‐growing loblolly pine were studied. Under the same pulping condition, the kappa number of the latewood kraft pulp was higher than that of the earlywood. At around the same kappa number, the yield of the latewood was higher than that of the earlywood. The bleaching results showed that the latewood kraft pulp had lower bleachability than the earlywood kraft pulp, due to its thicker cell wall and slower leaching rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.631

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Wood Chemistry and TechnologySame topicLignin and Wood ChemistryFrench-language works237,207