MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982649005 · doi:10.1002/aic.12125

Extents of reaction and flow for homogeneous reaction systems with inlet and outlet streams

2010· article· en· W1982649005 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIChE Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProcess Optimization and Integration
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
KeywordsInletHomogeneousFlow (mathematics)STREAMSMechanicsChemistryChemical reaction engineeringChemical reactorThermodynamicsCatalysisComputer sciencePhysicsMechanical engineeringEngineeringOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract For homogeneous reaction systems with inlet and outlet streams, this article proposes a linear transformation of the number of moles vector into three distinct parts, namely, the reaction variants, the inlet‐flow variants, and the reaction and inlet‐flow invariants. The transformed states can be interpreted physically as (i) the amount of material contributed by each reaction and still present in the reactor (extents of reaction), (ii) the amount of material contributed by each inlet stream and still present in the reactor (extents of inlet flow), and (iii) the fraction of the initial conditions that has left the reactor (extent of outlet flow). Furthermore, several implications of being able to compute the extents of reaction and inlet flow are discussed. The methodology is illustrated in simulation via the ethanolysis of phthalyl chloride. © 2010 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 2010

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.931
Threshold uncertainty score0.195

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it