MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982685239 · doi:10.3934/dcdsb.2010.14.1313

Supercritical surface waves generated by negative or oscillatory forcing

2010· article· en· W1982685239 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Physics Problems
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInviscid flowForcing (mathematics)Mathematical analysisKorteweg–de Vries equationPhysicsNonlinear systemInterval (graph theory)Function (biology)MathematicsInitial value problemCompressibilityClassical mechanicsMechanicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper studies forced surface waves on an incompressible,inviscid fluid in a two-dimensional channel with a small negative oroscillatory bump on a rigid flat bottom. Such wave motions aredetermined by a non-dimensional wave speed $F$, called Froudenumber, and $F=1$ is a critical value of $F$. If $F= 1+ \lambda\epsilon $ with a small parameter $\epsilon> 0$, then a forced Korteweg-de Vries (FKdV)equation can be derived to model the wave motion on the freesurface. In this paper, the case $\lambda > 0$ (or $F> 1$, calledsupercritical case) is considered. The steady and unsteady solutionsof the FKdV equation with a negative bump function independent oftime are first studied both theoretically and numerically. It isshown that there are five steady solutions and only one of them,which exists for all $\lambda > 0$, is stable. Then, solutions ofthe FKdV equation with an oscillatory bump function posed on $R$ ora finite interval are considered. The corresponding linear problemsare solved explicitly and the solutions are rigorously shown to beeventually periodic as time goes to infinity, while a similar resultholds for the nonlinear problem posed on a finite interval withsmall initial data and forcing functions. The nonlinear solutionswith zero initial data for any forcing functions in the real line$R$ or large forcing functions in a finite interval are obtainednumerically. It is shown numerically that the solutions will becomeeventually periodic in time for a small forcing function. Thebehavior of the solutions becomes quite irregular as time goes toinfinity, if the forcing function is large.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.241
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it