MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Gender and the progression of renal disease

2001· article· en· W1982698236 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen L. Seliger

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Nephrology & Hypertension · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
Canadian institutionsPancreas Centre (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiseaseMedicineNitric oxideInternal medicineEndocrinologyRenin–angiotensin systemChronic renal diseaseKidney diseaseHormoneDiabetes mellitusBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many studies of chronic renal disease have reported that men have a more rapid progression of renal insufficiency. However, other studies have found no differences between the sexes, and the true effect of sex on chronic renal disease remains a topic of controversy. There is evidence that women with non-diabetic renal diseases experience a slower progression, but in diabetic renal disease, the effect of gender is not yet established. Sex hormones may mediate the effects of gender on chronic renal disease, through alterations in the renin--angiotensin system, reduction in mesangial collagen synthesis, the modification of collagen degradation, and upregulation of nitric oxide synthesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.296

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations118
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in Nephrology & HypertensionSame topicChronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesFrench-language works237,207