MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Thoracic Pedicle Morphometry in Vertebrae from Scoliotic Spines

2004· article· en· W1982719450 on OpenAlexaff
Stefan Parent, Hubert Labelle, Wafa Skalli, Jacques A. de Guise

Bibliographic record

VenueSpine · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThoracic vertebraeAnatomyScoliosisVertebraRib cageRachisDeformityThoracic spineLumbar vertebraeOrthodonticsSurgeryLumbar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY DESIGN: A morphometric analysis of thoracic pedicles in vertebrae from scoliotic specimens. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to quantify the changes occurring in thoracic pedicles affected by a scoliotic deformity. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There exists a lot of controversy in the literature concerning the shape and size of thoracic pedicles in idiopathic scoliosis. In recent years, thoracic pedicle screws are being used more frequently in corrective spine surgery, but few studies have evaluated the morphology of scoliotic thoracic pedicles. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Thirty scoliotic specimens with curves presenting various degrees of severity were studied using a three-dimensional digitizing protocol developed to create a precise three-dimensional reconstruction of the vertebrae. Twenty-two parameters describing specifically the pedicles were then calculated for each vertebra from these reconstructions. Every scoliotic specimen was then matched with a normal specimen to provide for a representative control group and comparisons were made on pedicle width, length, height, surface, and orientation. RESULTS: A total of 683 thoracic vertebrae were measured (325 scoliotic and 358 normal vertebrae). Pedicles located on the concavity of typical right thoracic curves were found to be significantly thinner than their normal counterparts with a maximal mean difference of 1.37 mm at T8. The pedicles on the concavity of the high thoracic compensatory curve were also found to be significantly diminished with a maximal mean difference of 1.68 mm at T4. Mean left pedicle width at T8 (concavity) and mean right pedicle width at T4 (concavity) were found to be 4.08 mm and 2.60 mm, respectively. Pedicle length was found to be slightly increased, and pedicle height was found to be slightly decreased in pedicles from scoliotic spines with no preference for concavity or convexity. Pedicle orientation and inclination were unchanged with respect to each corresponding vertebral body. CONCLUSION: These results are of critical importance for clinicians performing spinal corrective surgery in patients with AIS. Pedicle width is significantly diminished on the concavity of scoliotic curves. Our results advocate caution in the use of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine especially on the concave side of the curve.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations115
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpineSame topicSpinal Fractures and Fixation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207