Comparing Safety Performance Measures Obtained from Video Capture Data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Safety performance is evaluated by using measures obtained experimentally from a videotaping of traffic operations at an urban roundabout situated in Cosenza, Italy. Five different expressions of safety performance from the perspective of “rear-end” vehicle interactions include maximum deceleration rate to avoid a crash (DRAC), time-to-collision (TTC), proportion of stopping distance (PSD), time integrated time-to-collision (TIT), and crash potential index (CPI). Differences in safety performance are discussed with respect to the type of measure, traffic conditions, and variations in roundabout geometry. The results of this analysis suggest that safety performance is highly sensitive to the way it is measured; different measures can highlight different locations or geometric features of the roundabout as posing potential safety problems. This study underscores the usefulness of safety performance measures for providing meaningful experimental indicators of potential safety problems at roundabouts and how these problems can be affected by changing traffic conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it