Applications of Artificial Neural Network in AIDS Research and Therapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years considerable effort has been devoted to applying pattern recognition techniques to the complex task of data analysis in drug research. Artificial neural networks (ANN) methodology is a modeling method with great ability to adapt to a new situation, or control an unknown system, using data acquired in previous experiments. In this paper, a brief history of ANN and the basic concepts behind the computing, the mathematical and algorithmic formulation of each of the techniques, and their developmental background is presented. Based on the abilities of ANNs in pattern recognition and estimation of system outputs from the known inputs, the neural network can be considered as a tool for molecular data analysis and interpretation. Analysis by neural networks improves the classification accuracy, data quantification and reduces the number of analogues necessary for correct classification of biologically active compounds. Conformational analysis and quantifying the components in mixtures using NMR spectra, aqueous solubility prediction and structure-activity correlation are among the reported applications of ANN as a new modeling method. Ranging from drug design and discovery to structure and dosage form design, the potential pharmaceutical applications of the ANN methodology are significant. In the areas of clinical monitoring, utilization of molecular simulation and design of bioactive structures, ANN would make the study of the status of the health and disease possible and brings their predicted chemotherapeutic response closer to reality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".