MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982770938 · doi:10.1080/09581590600828816

Neo-Marxist class position and socioeconomic status: Distinct or complementary determinants of health?

2006· article· en· W1982770938 on OpenAlex
Gerry Veenstra

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Public Health · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHealth disparities and outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsSocioeconomic statusMarxist philosophySocial classPrestigePosition (finance)Mental healthSociologyOccupational prestigeSample (material)SocioeconomicsSocial sciencePsychologyPolitical scienceDemographyEconomicsPopulationLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although the relationship between socioeconomic status and health has received careful attention from health researchers over the past half-century, the means by which income, education and occupational prestige are accumulated in society have received relatively short shrift in the health literature. This article explores the degree to which neo-Marxist conceptualizations of class position are ‘upstream’ determinants of health and well-being. Utilizing data from a survey sample of randomly selected and full-time employed residents of 25 communities in the Canadian province of British Columbia, it evaluates the usefulness of class position distinctions derived from the work of Erik Olin Wright as predictors of physical and mental health before and after controlling for socioeconomic status.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.538
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it