MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hard Metal Lung Disease

2005· article· en· W1982802254 on OpenAlexaff
P C Dunlop, Néstor L. Müller, Jennifer Wilson, Julia Flint, Andrew Churg

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Thoracic Imaging · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouver General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHoneycombingHard metalLungReticular connective tissueInterstitial lung diseaseRadiologyPathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hard metal lung disease (HMLD) is a rare form of interstitial lung disease caused by sensitization to cobalt. It occurs in patients exposed to hard metal (tungsten carbide) and in diamond workers who use cobalt-containing polishes. The chest radiograph may be normal or show a nodular, reticulonodular, or reticular pattern. The high-resolution CT findings have been described in a small number of patients. Reported abnormalities include patchy lobular ground glass opacities, consolidation, reticulation, centrilobular nodularity, and, occasionally, honeycombing.We describe the high-resolution CT findings in a patient with pathologically proven HMLD who demonstrated interval improvement in the ground glass opacities and persistence of the centrilobular nodules following cessation of exposure to hard metal and treatment with corticosteroids. To our knowledge, this is the first described case of HMLD with follow-up CT examination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Thoracic ImagingSame topicInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisFrench-language works237,207