MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982804661 · doi:10.1109/lawp.2013.2264431

A Two-Port Chassis-Mode MIMO Antenna

2013· article· en· W1982804661 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMIMOAntenna (radio)ChassisAntenna efficiencyEnvelope (radar)Electronic engineeringRadiation patternAntenna arrayPhysicsComputer scienceTopology (electrical circuits)Electrical engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineeringBeamforming

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The design of multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) antennas based on characteristic modes has attracted considerable attention recently. This letter presents a novel MIMO antenna that excites the same two eigenmodes from each of its two ports, but with a 180 <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">°</sup> phase difference between the modal excitation coefficients of one of the dominant modes. This provides the antenna with two orthogonal radiation patterns that can be independently excited from each of the two ports of the antenna, without a complex power dividing network that is typical of other designs based on characteristic modes. A fabricated prototype gives 21.2 dB of isolation between the ports. Good agreement is observed between the measured and simulated radiation patterns, and the envelope correlation coefficient between the patterns was measured to be 0.0638.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.957

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it