MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982807028 · doi:10.1109/infcom.2013.6567091

Connectivity in two-dimensional lattice networks

2013· article· en· W1982807028 on OpenAlexaff
Lei Zhang, Lin Cai, Jianping Pan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOpportunistic and Delay-Tolerant Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSquare latticeWireless ad hoc networkLattice (music)Computer sciencePercolation (cognitive psychology)Percolation thresholdVertex (graph theory)Mobile ad hoc networkPercolation theoryStatistical physicsMathematicsWirelessCombinatoricsTheoretical computer scienceTopology (electrical circuits)PhysicsIsing modelTelecommunicationsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Connectivity has been extensively studied in ad hoc networks, most recently with the application of percolation theory in two-dimensional square lattices. Given a message source and the bond probability to connect neighbor vertexes on the lattice, percolation theory tries to determine the critical bond probability above which there exists an infinite connected giant component with high probability. This paper studies a related but different problem: what is the connectivity from the source to any vertex on the square lattice following certain directions? The original directed percolation problem has been studied in statistical physics for more than half a century, with only simulation results available. In this paper, by using a recursive decomposition approach, we have obtained the analytical expressions for directed connectivity. The results can be widely used in wireless and mobile ad hoc networks, including vehicular ad hoc networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score0.432

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOpportunistic and Delay-Tolerant NetworksFrench-language works237,207