Resetting of the cardiopulmonary baroreflex 10 years after surgical repair of coarctation of the aorta
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To characterise cardiopulmonary baroreflex responses and examine the effects of a 45 minute cycling bout late after successful repair of coarctation of the aorta. SUBJECTS: 10 young adults (mean (SEM) age 18.1 (2.6 years)) operated on for coarctation of the aorta 12.7 (3.5) years earlier, and 10 healthy controls. DESIGN: Forearm blood flow (venous occlusion plethysmography) and vascular resistance, left ventricular internal diastolic diameter, and central venous pressure estimated from an antecubital vein were measured in the supine position at baseline and during five minute applications of lower body negative pressure (LBNP) at -15 mm Hg (LBNP(-15)) and -40 mm Hg (LBNP(-40)). Venous samples were obtained at baseline and during LBNP(-40) for noradrenaline (norepinephrine), adrenaline (epinephrine), renin activity, and aldosterone. The tests were repeated after 45 minutes of moderate exercise. RESULTS: Baseline heart rate (78 (9) v 64 (6) beats/min), echocardiographic cardiac output (6.9 (1.1) v 5.0 (0.2) l/min), shortening fraction (41.7 (1.8)% v 33.3 (1.3)%), and forearm blood flow (3.4 (0.4) v 2.3 (0.3) ml/100 g/min) were higher in the coarctation group than in the controls (p < 0.05). Changes in forearm blood flow and forearm vascular resistance from baseline to LBNP(-40) were similar in both groups, but the relation between forearm vascular resistance and estimated central venous pressure or left ventricular internal diastolic diameter was shifted downward in the coarctation group. Plasma adrenaline was increased in the coarctation group (baseline: 3.2 (0.6) v 2.4 (0.3) pmol/l in controls; LBNP(-40): 687 (151) v 332 (42) pmol/l) (p < 0.05). Both groups showed a similar downward displacement of forearm vascular resistance (p < 0.05) after exercise. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be resetting of the cardiopulmonary baroreflex to a lower forearm vascular resistance in young adults operated on for coarctation of the aorta, associated with hyperdynamic left ventricular function. Raised circulating adrenaline could contribute to the lower forearm vascular resistance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".