MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982820505 · doi:10.1159/000132718

Determination of the breakpoints of 1;7 translocations in myelodysplastic syndrome by in situ hybridization using chromosome-specific α satellite DNA from human chromosomes 1 and 7

2008· article· en· W1982820505 on OpenAlexaff
Tiina Alitalo, H F Willard, Albert de la Chapelle

Bibliographic record

VenueCytogenetics and Cell Genetics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChromosomal translocationBiologyChromosomeHybridization probeMolecular biologyChromosome 22Chromosome 21Fluorescence in situ hybridizationKaryotypeCytogeneticsSatellite DNAGeneticsDNAGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A whole-arm translocation involving the short arm of chromosome 7 and the long arm of chromosome 1 occurs nonrandomly in myelodysplastic syndrome and acute nonlymphocytic leukemia. In situ hybridization, using alpha satellite DNA specific for the centromeric regions of chromosomes 1 (probe pSD1-1) and 7 (probe p21-4), was performed to determine the exact breakpoints of the translocation. Both probes hybridized to the centromeric region of the translocation chromosome in metaphases from two patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Both probes hybridized with approximately equal strength to either chromosome 1 or 7 and to the 1;7 translocation chromosome, suggesting that the t(1;7) had retained the chromosome-specific alpha satellite DNA from both chromosomes. These studies permit us to propose a new description, t(1;7)(cen;cen), for this translocation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCytogenetics and Cell GeneticsSame topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesFrench-language works237,207