MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982834169 · doi:10.1097/brs.0b013e31823a426f

Does Radiating Spinal Pain Determine Future Work Disability? A Retrospective Cohort Study of 22,952 Danish Twins

2011· article· en· W1982834169 on OpenAlexafffund
Vicki L. Kristman, Jan Hartvigsen, Charlotte Leboeuf‐Yde, Kirsten Ohm Kyvik, J Cassidy

Bibliographic record

VenueSpine · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkPublic Health OntarioUniversity of TorontoLakehead University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineDanishRetrospective cohort studyCohort studyPhysical therapyCohortPhysical medicine and rehabilitationSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY DESIGN: Population-based, retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether radiating spinal pain from the low back, mid back, and neck is associated with future use of health-related benefits and their duration as compared with those with nonradiating spinal pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Studies on the socioeconomic consequences of radiating pain have primarily focused on the low back and to a lesser extent on the neck and mid back. In addition, few studies report on the incidence of health-related benefit use after any radiating spinal pain. METHODS: A cohort of 22,952 subjects was formed from the 2002 survey of the Danish Twin Registry. The survey contained information on spinal pain and important confounding factors. Work disability for an 8-year period was determined through data linkage with the Danish Register-Based Evaluation of Marginalization (DREAM) register of government transfer payments. We determined the incidence rate ratio for receipt of sickness benefit and the mean duration of the first and total sickness benefit periods by radiating and nonradiating spinal pain. Relative risks for the occurrence and number of sickness benefit episodes were calculated by radiating spinal pain status. RESULTS: The incidence of sickness benefit was greater for those with radiating spinal pain (89.6 per 1000 person-years [95% confidence interval: 86.0, 93.2]) than those with nonradiating spinal pain (60.4 per 1000 person-years [95% confidence interval: 57.7, 63.1]). However, the duration of time off work, conditional on 1 day or more off work, was the same between those with and without radiating spinal pain. CONCLUSION: Radiating spinal pain is an important risk factor for future sickness benefit. Radiating spinal pain was not associated with the duration of sickness benefit. These findings were independent of the effects of pain duration at baseline. The results highlight the need for interventions to prevent the onset of work disability, especially for those with radiating pain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.098

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpineSame topicSpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyFrench-language works237,207