Palivizumab prophylaxis for respiratory syncytial virus in Canada: utilization and outcomes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To provide information on the use and outcomes of palivizumab prophylaxis in children at high risk of serious respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection. DESIGN: Observational, prospective, longitudinal, multicenter study. SETTING: Eighteen hospitals and pediatric clinics located in six provinces across Canada. PATIENTS: Infants enrolled in the palivizumab Special Access Programme of Canada's Therapeutic Products Programme throughout the 1999 to 2000 RSV season. Most were premature infants born at < or = 32 weeks of gestation and/or had bronchopulmonary dysplasia. METHODS AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Neonatal and demographic data were recorded for each subject. The parent/caregiver was contacted on a monthly basis until the end of the RSV season to obtain information on palivizumab utilization and compliance as well as incidence and severity of respiratory infections. RESULTS: There were 444 evaluable subjects who each received 1 to 7 injections of palivizumab for a total of 1702 doses from September 1999 to April 2000. Most subjects received 5 injections with high compliance. Prophylaxis was discontinued in 2% of children. There were 116 clinical events or hospitalizations involving respiratory tract infections reported in 91 children. Eighty-six of these were managed in an outpatient setting, and 30 required hospitalization. The estimated incidence of hospitalization for RSV-positive lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) was 2.4%. Hospitalization for RSV LRTI occurred more often in children with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (6.0%) than in those with prematurity only (1.6%). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that prophylaxis with palivizumab during the RSV season was associated with a low rate of hospitalization for RSV-positive LRTIs. Palivizumab was well-tolerated, and compliance was high. The findings confirm the results of the major randomized clinical trial of palivizumab and demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of RSV prophylaxis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".