Magnetohydrodynamic compressible laminar boundary-layer adiabatic flow with adverse pressure gradient and continuous or localized mass transfer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The problem of magnetohydrodynamic compressible boundary-layer flow over a flat plate, in the presence of an adverse pressure gradient, is studied numerically. The fluid is assumed to be Newtonian, electrically conducting and the magnetic field is constant and applied transversely to the direction of the flow. The fluid flow is subjected to a constant velocity of suction and (or) injection, continuous or localized, and there is no heat transfer between the plate and the fluid (adiabatic flow). The system of partial differential equations, describing the problem under consideration, is solved numerically by applying a modification of the Keller box technique. Numerical calculations are carried out for different values of the free-stream Mach number and the magnetic parameter for continuous or localized suction and (or) injection imposed at the wall. The results obtained are shown in the figures and their analysis shows that the flow field can be controlled by the application of a magnetic field as well as by continuous or localized suction and (or) injection. PACS Nos.: 51.00, 52.00
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".