MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Material Properties of Bridge Deck Dedicated Interface Agent and Key Construction Techniques

2013· article· en· W1982901803 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced materials research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCivil and Geotechnical Engineering Research
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Transportation of Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridge deckBridge (graph theory)Interface (matter)Structural engineeringDeckCementMaterials scienceKey (lock)Beam (structure)EngineeringComputer scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes a cement concrete bridge deck dedicated interface agent,which can effectively resolve the debonding problem between cement concrete bridge deck pavement and beam body. Then, it focuses on experimental investigation on new and old concrete bonding shear performance, and verification of bonding properties of interface agent. Finally,it puts forward specific requirements and cautions for the construction of interface agent,especially emphasizing that cleaning treatment shall be conducted on beam top and restore its surface structure before spraying interface agent for better bonding with pavement. Keywords: Cement Concrete Bridge Deck; Interface Bond; Interface Agent; Shear Test; Construction Technique

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.514

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it