MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982917908 · doi:10.1117/12.914993

Particle focusing in a microfluidic channel with acoustic metamaterial

2012· article· en· W1982917908 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaobing Cai, Qiuquan Guo, Gengkai Hu, Jun Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Phenomena Research
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrochannelMetamaterialParticle (ecology)Materials scienceAcousticsAcoustic waveMicrochannel plate detectorMechanicsOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Particle focusing has been numerically studied in a microchannel filled by an acoustic metamaterial fluid that possesses negative density, and under a pair of ultrasound incidences from the lateral boundaries. Acoustic metamaterial with negative density exponentially damps the ultrasound field along its propagation direction that forms a very low field at the center of the microchannel. Driven by the acoustic radiation force and dissipated by the fluid, the particles laterally vibrate in the microchannel and gradually aggregated in the vicinity of the channel center. A structural microchannel with acoustic resonant elements that generates equivalent negative density property for the fluid in the microchannel has been designed, which decays the ultrasound field in a similar way. Particle movement in the structural microchannel has also been investigated and particle focusing is also achieved. The merit of the proposed particle focusing method by metamaterial concept lies in its independence on the type of the incident wave and width or size of the microchannel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicAcoustic Wave Phenomena ResearchFrench-language works237,207