Study of Burst Conditions of Thin-Walled Pressure Vessels Subjected to Hypervelocity Impact
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present paper is devoted to analysis of burst conditions of thin-walled cylindrical pressure vessels subjected to hypervelocity impact of space debris particles. Two types of gas-filled pressure vessels onboard the International Space Station were considered: inhabited or laboratory pressurized modules and onboard system vessels with a gas under high pressure. The central concern of this study is to determine the border between simple perforation and catastrophic fracture of gas-filled pressure vessels of both types under hypervelocity impact. Non-linear fracture mechanics techniques were used to analyze and predict whether a vessel perforation will lead to mere leakage of gas, or whether unstable crack propagation will occur that could lead to catastrophic fracture of the vessel. Damage patterns and mechanisms leading to unstable crack growth are discussed. A model of fracture of an impact damaged pressure vessel is presented. A developed model was successfully applied to the simulation of experimental results obtained at Ernst-Mach-Institute (Germany).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".